Magnesium Oxide Board vs Drywall: A Builder's Guide to Smart Choice
- JP Group MagMatrix Brand
- 1 day ago
- 7 min read
The choice between magnesium oxide board vs drywall extends way beyond the reach and influence of price alone. MgO boards are a great way to get fire protection with an A1 non-combustible rating. Traditional gypsum boards are nowhere near a match for this level of protection. Our tests reveal similar performance gaps in moisture resistance. MgO boards show just 0.34% surface moisture absorption, while gypsum boards reach nearly 3%.
The unique composition of MgO boards makes them remarkably durable and resistant to impact. This becomes particularly important in high-traffic areas. Looking at magnesium oxide board vs gypsum board performance, MgO boards stand out in extreme conditions. These boards maintain their structural integrity even after 100 days underwater. The mgo board vs drywall cost difference needs careful evaluation of long-term benefits against initial investment. Bathrooms, kitchens, and outdoor installations benefit from MgO's exceptional performance. The environmental advantages, including lower harmful emissions during manufacturing, make the extra cost worthwhile.
Material Composition and Core Differences For Magnesium Oxide Board
MgO board and drywall are different in their composition, and this affects how they perform. Builders need to understand these differences to make the right choice for their projects.
What is MgO board made of?
Manufacturers engineer MgO boards using a precise mix of natural minerals and reinforcing materials. Magnesium oxide powder serves as the main ingredient - a non-toxic inorganic material that comes from magnesium-rich ores like magnesite. This powder combines with magnesium chloride or magnesium sulfate that binds everything together. When these components react chemically, they create an incredibly strong cementitious matrix.
MgO boards need more than just these core elements to work well. They contain perlite, a volcanic glass that makes the boards better at insulating while keeping them light. Wood fibers make the boards more flexible and structurally sound. The boards also use non-woven fabric to create smooth surfaces and bond layers together.
Gypsum core vs Magnesium oxide core
Drywall has a completely different makeup. It uses gypsum - a soft sulfate mineral - between layers of paper. This design hasn't changed much over the years, though companies now make special versions for different uses.
MgO cores resist fire better because of their mineral makeup. The dense structure helps these boards stand up to moisture. Gypsum can soak up to 3% moisture, but MgO boards keep their shape even when wet.
The way we make these materials is different too. MgO boards go through calcination at temperatures from 700°C to 1,400°C, which creates different grades of reactivity. This process gives us a product that's better for the environment and doesn't release harmful volatile organic compounds.
Fiberglass mesh vs paper facing
The most noticeable difference between these materials is what covers them. Regular drywall uses paper on both sides, with a smooth front surface ready for paint. Paper facing is cheap but doesn't handle moisture or wear and tear very well.
MgO boards are better because they have fiberglass mesh throughout the board. This mesh makes the boards much stronger, stops them from cracking, and keeps them stable. Unlike paper-faced drywall, these boards can take hits and physical stress without breaking down.
When it comes to joints, fiberglass mesh tape sticks by itself but needs setting-type compound because it's elastic. Paper tape needs to be embedded in joint compound, but it creates stronger joints that don't stretch as much.

Performance Metrics: Fire, Water, and Strength
Performance metrics show clear advantages of magnesium oxide board over drywall in tough environments. These measurable differences can substantially affect safety, durability, and value over time.
Fire Resistance: A1 rating vs Type X drywall
MgO boards have earned the highest A1 non-combustible classification under European standards and protect against fire for up to 4 hours. Their mineral composition lets them withstand temperatures up to 1200°C (2,192°F) without losing structural integrity.
Standard drywall protects against fire for just 30-60 minutes. Type X drywall's glass fiber reinforcement offers only 1-hour protection. Gypsum's fire resistance depends on its 21% crystalline water content that creates temporary steam protection before breaking down.
Water Resistance: 0.34% vs 3% absorption
MgO boards excel at resisting moisture. They absorb only 0.34% surface moisture while gypsum takes in nearly 3% under the same conditions. Quality magnesium oxide board stays structurally stable even after 100 days underwater.
These boards maintain their shape in wet environments without swelling or warping. They also resist mold growth. Bathrooms, kitchens, and basements where regular drywall fails quickly are perfect spots for MgO boards.
Impact Strength: 4.5 kJ vs 1 kJ
MgO boards shine in high-traffic areas. Their impact strength ratings reach 4.5 kilojoules or higher. Internal fiberglass mesh reinforcement helps spread force throughout the structure.
Regular drywall can only handle 1 kilojoule of impact. It dents and cracks easily from everyday damage. Schools, hospitals, and commercial spaces need the lasting durability that magnesium oxide board provides.
Bending Strength: 18–27 MPa vs <5.6 MPa
MgO boards show their strength in flexural testing too. They achieve bending strength ratings of 18-27 MPa, making them five times stronger than gypsum at 5.6 MPa.
Buildings last longer with magnesium oxide board because it handles stress better than gypsum board. Its superior strength means fewer repairs and replacements throughout a building's life.
Installation and Handling Experience
Building materials' practical aspects play a crucial role in determining their project suitability. The differences in installation between these materials can substantially affect labor costs and project timelines.
Ease of cutting and shaping
Scoring and snapping works well with thin MgO boards (8mm or less), much like in drywall. Thicker MgO boards need circular saws with carbide-tipped blades to achieve clean cuts. Drywall proves easier to work with—you just score it with a utility knife and snap along the line. This makes drywall a better choice for intricate designs.
DIY vs professional installation
Most DIY enthusiasts choose drywall because it weighs less and needs simple tools. MgO boards usually require professional installers, with costs ranging between USD 3.00 and USD 8.00 per square foot. MgO boards' big advantage lies in their immediate usability after installation, while drywall takes up to seven days for joint compound to set properly.
Tool requirements for MgO vs drywall
You can install drywall with simple hand tools—utility knives, T-squares, and standard drywall screws. MgO boards, however, require specialized equipment such as circular saws with thin carbide blades and rotary tools with carbide bits for outlets and pipes. Workers must wear dust masks when cutting MgO boards.
Weight and density: 950–1050 kg/m³ vs 640–800 kg/m³
MgO board's density ranges between 950-1050 kg/m³, while drywall sits at 640-800 kg/m³. MgO boards weigh 20-30% less than other cement-based boards but still exceed drywall's weight. The material's higher density adds to its durability but makes it harder to handle.
Cost and Environmental Considerations
Building materials' financial equation goes beyond original pricing to cover lifetime value and environmental effects.
MgO board vs drywall cost breakdown
MgO boards come with a premium price tag of USD 1.50-3.50 per square foot, while drywall costs a modest USD 0.30-0.70. This big difference comes from MgO's complex manufacturing process and better performance capabilities. Installation costs widen this gap even more - professionals charge USD 3.00-8.00 per square foot for MgO boards compared to drywall's USD 2.21-2.62.
Long-term durability and maintenance savings
Time changes the economics dramatically. Building costs make up just 10-20% of lifetime expenses. Maintenance and operations take up the remaining 80-90%. MgO boards last 20-30 years - twice as long as gypsum's 10-15 year lifespan. This longer life and minimal repair needs often make up for the higher upfront cost.
Recyclability and CO2 absorption
MgO boards can be recycled completely. Users can grind them into powder for soil enrichment or use them in new construction materials. On top of that, through passive carbonation, these boards naturally absorb 20-40% of their carbon dioxide emissions within 15 years after installation. Drywall presents a stark contrast by contributing about 15% to construction waste.
Raw material sourcing and carbon footprint
MgO board production creates about 340 kg of CO2 per ton - nowhere near drywall's 740 kg. Lower processing temperatures are the reason (600°C-1300°C for MgO vs 1400°C for gypsum). Manufacturers can source magnesium oxide from natural magnesite deposits with minimal environmental impact or extract it from seawater and brine resources.
Comparison Table
Characteristic | Magnesium Oxide Board | Drywall |
Material Properties | ||
Core Composition | Magnesium oxide powder with magnesium chloride/sulfate binding | Gypsum core with paper facing |
Facing Material | Fiberglass mesh | Paper |
Density | 950-1050 kg/m³ | 640-800 kg/m³ |
Performance Metrics | ||
Fire Resistance | A1 rating (up to 4 hours) | 30-60 minutes (standard)1 hour (Type X) |
Water Absorption | 0.34% | 3% |
Strength on Impact | 4.5 kJ | 1 kJ |
Bending Strength | 18-27 MPa | <5.6 MPa |
Expected Life | 20-30 years | 10-15 years |
Installation | ||
Cutting Method | Scoring/snapping (≤8mm)Circular saw (>8mm) | Simple scoring and snapping |
Installation Cost | $3.00-8.00 per sq ft | $2.21-2.62 per sq ft |
Professional Installation | Required | Optional |
Cost & Environmental | ||
Material Cost | $1.50-3.50 per sq ft | $0.30-0.70 per sq ft |
CO2 Emissions | 340 kg per ton | 740 kg per ton |
Recyclability | 100% recyclable | Contributes to 15% construction waste |
CO2 Absorption | 20-40% within 15 years | Not mentioned |
Conclusion
Your project's specific needs and long-term goals will determine the choice between magnesium oxide board and drywall. MgO boards show clear performance advantages in several critical areas. Without doubt, their superior fire resistance, minimal water absorption, and exceptional impact strength make them perfect for high-moisture environments that need improved durability.
The decision requires careful thought. MgO boards' higher upfront cost for materials and installation must be weighed against their impressive lifespan and lower maintenance needs. Bathrooms, kitchens, basements, and exterior applications justify the extra initial investment over time.
Standard drywall remains an economical option for interior walls in low-moisture areas where fire resistance isn't as critical. On top of that, its lighter weight and simple installation process make it a great fit for DIY projects and budget-conscious renovations.
MgO boards' environmental benefits deserve attention. Their manufacturing creates a lower carbon footprint, and they are completely recyclable. These boards can naturally absorb CO2, which matches today's green building practices perfectly.
A smart builder looks at both options and uses each material where its strengths work best. This isn't an either/or choice - you can take a mixed approach. MgO boards work great in critical areas while traditional drywall fits where its limitations won't affect long-term performance. This balanced strategy gives the best value and keeps your building's integrity and safety standards strong for decades.




Comments